Connect with us


Are You Overlooking These 3 Energy Stocks?

A. Lawrence



Ever hear of Crestwood Equity Partners (NYSE: CEQP), Oasis Midstream Partners (NYSE: OMP), and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE: HSM)? Probably not and because of that most investors might have missed the fact that these high-yielding master limited partnerships have been running hot this year. But while all have delivered strong returns in 2018 investors may want to continue to monitor new developments closely.

Crestwood Equity Partners, for example, has been running this year, gaining nearly 55% due to clear signs that the once-struggling MLP is not only back on more sound ground but could be ready to see accelerated growth. Steering that view is the company’s backlog of high return growth projects that it anticipates will fuel a more than 15% compound annual growth rate in earnings and cash flow over the next three years. These projects include a number of new natural gas processing plant expansions as well as the continued buildout of its oil and gas gathering systems across several fast-growing shale regions in the U.S.

Units of Oasis Midstream have jumped more than 33% in 2018, which is the MLP’s first full year as a public company. Pushing that return has been the more than 50% boost in the MLP’s earnings over the past year, aided by an uptick in volumes of oil, natural gas, and water flowing through its gathering systems. That growth has allowed Oasis Midstream to increase its distribution to investors by a 20% annualized rate in the last year so that it now yields more than 7%.

Hess Midstream Partners has benefited from a strong year, delivering a gain of nearly 20%. Helping the pipeline company’s return has been its own uptick in the volumes flowing through its pipelines, processing plants, and storage terminals, which have come in higher than anticipated as a result of rising oil prices. That better-than-anticipated growth enabled the company to boost its cash flow guidance range from $87 million-$92 million up to $91 million-$96 million. It also allowed Hess Midstream Partners to increase its distribution to investors by 15% over the past year so that it now yields 5.9%.

More to Come?

While Crestwood Equity, Hess Midstream, and Oasis Midstream have all delivered strong gains this year, that doesn’t mean investors have completely missed out on the upside that energy stocks have presented thus far. That’s because all three, as well as many others, are showing clearly visible growth potential. With that combination of upside opportunity and high yields, MLPs could continue to beat the market in the years to come.

Continue Reading
Click to comment


“Oil Be Right Back,” Says Crude Prices

Daniel Chase




We talk quite a bit about the power of social media but when it comes to President Trump’s affinity for tweeting (TWTR), the influential nature of social platforms is taken to an entirely different level. The president may tweet support for a Republican candidate running for Congress, or send his thoughts and prayers to victims of yet another mass shooting, and every tweet he shares, like clockwork, becomes a national headline as soon as a member of the media gets a notification on their smartphone. 

“Trump tweets as if he has a joystick and he has everything under his command like he is playing one of these video games.”

Tom Kloza, Global Head of Energy Analysis, Oil Price Information Service 

Over the course of the last month, the price of crude oil has dropped 25%, with the cost of gasoline sinking to as little as $2 a gallon in a few states. According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), the United States has “surpassed Russia and Saudi Arabia to become the world’s largest crude oil producer earlier this year,” making President Trump so very happy. In fact, to express his pleasure with the news on oil prices, Trump shockingly took to Twitter (TWTR) to share his feelings:

“Oil prices getting lower. Great! Like a big Tax Cut for America and the World. Enjoy! $54, was just $82. Thank you to Saudi Arabia, but let’s get lower.”

President Donald Trump on Twitter

Let’s unpack that tweet for a minute, shall we? First of all, oil is currently trading around $50 barrel, which is the cheapest crude has been in over a year, specifically since October 4, 2017, when the price dropped just below the $50 threshold. When the price per barrel of crude drops, consumers enjoy a nice discount at the gas pump, but for all other stakeholders in the oil industry, price dives like this bring up imminent fears of a bear market.

 Before he even took office, President Trump made it clear that he wanted every product, service, and commodity to be manufactured in America and only America. As it relates to the oil industry, this has translated to a rush to pump oil out of shale fields around the country, most notably in West Texas, miraculously leading to record-high levels of production for black gold. Though domestic oil production couldn’t be higher, concerns about oversupply have sent oil prices every which way but loose. 

Clifford Krauss, a contributor to the New York Times, writes that oil is currently resting on an economic sweet spot, given that prices are not so high that consumers and businesses feel pressed for cash, and not so low as to disrupt business for engird companies and oil exporters like Saudi Arabia and Russia. Since President Trump insisted the US focus more domestic crude, oil production has more than doubled in the last ten years, to over 11 million barrels per day. The recent drop in oil prices has not only raised concerns for investors in the space,  but for manufacturers and the hundreds of thousands of oil workers that fear for their jobs. According to the New York Times, the last time oil prices slid in 2014, “more than 160,000 oil workers lost their jobs.” Think about it. If oil prices decrease, so too does the profit enjoyed by oil producers because a decrease in cost, coupled with overstock, will result in less demand, and therefore, less of a need for oil workers. 

Investors in crude are hoping that oil prices will shoot back up after nations discuss the state of the oil industry at the G20 summit this weekend, specifically praying that Russian President Vladimir Putin and Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will come to an agreement, but Putin told several media sources on Thursday that the recent drop in oil prices bares no effect on him or his country, whatsoever. 

Continue Reading


Will Oil Prices Improve In 2019?

Daniel Chase




Apparently, senseless murder triggers no hesitation when considering business partnerships as President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that the U.S. will stand with Saudi Arabia, despite the fact that the CIA concluded that Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. 

“It could very well be that the Crown Prince had knowledge of this tragic event. Maybe he did and maybe he didn’t”

President Donald Trump 

Ignoring for the moment that President Trump might not the greatest judge of character in the world, the president made it clear that is alignment with Saudi Arabia was pure with the interest of keeping oil prices low. Trump told reporters that “if we broke with them [Saudi Arabia], I think your oil prices would go through the roof,” according to CNBC. It seems, at least on the surface, that the cost of crude far more important to the US than the murder of an American journalist. Despite Trump’s comments and collaboration with the Saudi government, as of November 8th, oil is officially in bear-territory. 

Earlier this month President Trump announced plans for imposing sanctions on Iranian oil production. The plan, via the sanctions, was for Iran, the world’s fourth-largest producer of crude, to slowly recede from the market, and in turn, Saudi Arabia would ramp up their own production of crude. On paper, Trump’s sanctions seemed fool-proof, and in anticipation, the price of Brent crude (CO), the international benchmark, went above $86 in early October, according to the Economist. 

Instead, the oil industry failed to meet the expectations of the Trump administration. Last week, the price of Brent (CO) crude remained at $66.53 per barrel, and West Texas Intermediate (CL), the American oil benchmark, has suffered the longest uninterrupted decline in thirty years. The downtrend for the U.S. crude benchmark, according to MarketWatch, is on the brink of forming a death cross — “a chart formation in an asset that many market technicians believe marks the point that a short-term decline morphs into a longer-term downtrend.” 

The oil market’s recent volatility could be attributed to recent attempts from several members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ (OPEC) to be the authoritative voices for the international crude market; America, Russia, and Saudi Arabia. Over the course of the last year, especially after Trump’s Iranian oil sanctions, America because the world’s number-one producer of crude. According to recent reports, American oil output in August was 23% above the level twelve months earlier, and with greater inventory comes lesser demand from consumers, and cheaper prices overall. News like this is not what investors want to hear, they expect higher returns and the surplus of crude is not helping the issue. 

Edward Morse, an energy economist from Citigroup, blames President Trump’s trade policies for the recent depression in global demand for crude. Before he was sworn into office, Trump made it clear from the very beginning that brings production back to America was at the top of his platform heading into the 2016 election season. The whole “Make America Great Again” tagline was born out of the notion that the country’s foreign dependence on manufacturing and production had gotten out of hand. 

When Trump took office, he acted on his campaign promises and has since worked to lessen America’s need for foreign imports. As a direct consequence of Trump’s crackdown on American exports, the growth in air freight and shipping has dropped nearly 50% in the last year, resulting in a dampened need for diesel fuel. 

As we had into 2019, investors in the crude industry are hungry for oil price forecasts. Some analysts believe that oil prices, albeit falling as of recent, could spike soon. OPEC and its partners are scheduled to meet in Vienna next month, which could cause the market to react either way, depending on how the meeting goes. 

Continue Reading


General Electric (GE) Stock Rebooting After Unplugging Flannery As CEO

Daniel Chase



ge stock price

After only a year on the job, John Flannery is out. The former chairman and CEO of General Electric was removed on Monday, October 1, 2018, as a result of the board’s dissatisfaction with “the execution that was taking place under John Flannery’s leadership,” CNBC’s Andrew Sorkin said on “Squawk Box,” citing sources. According to CNBC, Flanner’s removal was largely driven by the “slow pace of change” under Flannery, and not driven by the power business woes,” which many would infer was the reasoning. Early last week, GE’s shares had fallen to a nine-year low last week, trading at $11.27 per share.

Flannery was appointed as CEO in August of 2017, taking over for Jeff Immelt. Regardless of this leadership change, GE’s value continued to depreciate, setting record lows as investors were “unconvinced by Flannery’s turnaround plan.” While Flannery made countless efforts to shift the tide that was driving the industry conglomerate onto shore into rocky waters, these attempts failed.

Perhaps the largest blip on Flannery’s career as CEO took place several weeks ago on Thursday, September 20, 2018, when GE Power Chief Executive Russell Stokes shared, in a letter posted on LinkedIn, thattherer were multiple issues with its newest line of natural gas-fired power turbines. Stokes explained the issues found with the “HA turbines” in a blog titled, “Making the Best Turbines is Hard Enough. At GE, We Never Stop Making Them Better.”

“More recently, we identified an issue that we expect to impact our HA units. It involves an oxidation issue that affects the lifespan of a single blade component”

  • Russell Stokes, President and CEO of General Electric Power

Stokes post is less about giving excuses for failed attempts at revolutionizing power generation and more so about leveling with consumers and stakeholders. He begins his post by saying that GE power came to life with two key notions, the first of which being “innovation is hard, but it is the lifeblood of what we do. One rarely arrives a significant breakthrough without taking on seemingly insurmountable obstacles that might make others give up.” I applaud his efforts, not because he is trying to strengthen his arguments for his department’s failures, but because he is trying to connect with his readers, and moreover because Stokes humanizes General Electric. To err is human, but rarely do we associate corporations with humanism. If anything, perhaps this softened the blow, or at least, allowed Stokes to still have a position at GE Power.

“One rarely arrives a significant breakthrough without taking on seemingly insurmountable obstacles that might make others give up”

John Flannery’s fate was not as bright.  While this incident relating the HA turbines occurred during John Flannery’s holding of the CEO position, according to CNBC’s Andrew Sorkin, his removal “was not driven by the turbine issue.”

Following his removal, GE installed former Danaher CEO Lawrence Culp as his successor. After GE made this announcement on Monday, October 1,2017, GE shares shot up 13 percent in trading.

According to the Wall Street Journal, “Mr. Culp is expected to continue with the strategy to spin off GE’s health-care business and sell two other big units, these people said, leaving the company focused on its power and aviation units.” Lawrence Culp is the first person, not hired from within the company, to run GE. The company is known for its extensive history of homegrown executive leadership. Former CEOs Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt both served for over fifteen years each.

Culp comes to General Electric after serving as CEO of Danaher from 2001 until 2015, having led the company through multiple acquisitions. During his time as CEO, “total shareholder return was 465 percent.” He joined the GE board in April and has spent time cultivating relationships with other board members.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the CEO spent his first day on the job “ in the company’s Boston headquarters, calling investors” and getting settled.

Continue Reading

Join Our Newsletter

Get stock alerts, news & trending stock alerts straight to your inbox!

We keep all user information pricate & promise to never spam.*

Privacy Policy

Search Stock Price (


Subscribe Now & Begin Receiving Free Stocks News, Articles, Trade Alerts & MORE, all 100% FREE!

We are your #1 source for all things Stock Market & Finance, Subscribe Below!

Privacy Policy: We will NEVER share, sell, barter, etc. any of our subscribers information for any reason ever! By subscribing you agree we can send you via email our free e-newsletter on stock market & finance related, articles, news and trade alerts. Further questions please contact